|
Under Mexican law it is illegal for longliners to fish commercially
within 50 miles of the coast of the Sea of Cortes. Though
this ban was passed to preserve these rich waters for sportsfishing
- an activity that brings great benefits to coastal communities
- commercial interests have circumvented the law.
Background
In 2000, Shark NORMA-029 was created as a mechanism by CONAPESCA
to allow longliners to come within the 50 mile no-fishing
zone by issuing "shark permits" under new regulations
for shark fishing. This permit would allow these longliners
to keep all bycatch, including sportsfish, such as marlin,
dorado, sailfish, wahoo etc. The Shark NORMA-029 or "regulations
for sustainable shark fisheries" were in essence a license
to break the law, and would have further depleted the already
devastated fisheries.
In 2001, SeaWatch helped videographer and producer Armando
Figeredo make 24 special TV reports for Televisa (one of the
world's most-watched television stations). Televisa brought
their morning news team to Baja for one week, and every morning
the news was dedicated to stories condemning the Shark NORMA
regulations. Advertisements were placed in the major Mexican
newspapers demanding Shark NORMA be stopped - SeaWatch, along
with other conservation groups, spent $60,000 US publishing
an open letter to President Fox, explaining to him the problem
with Shark NORMA and how he could intervene. Much more impressive
was the overwhelming roster of high-profile signatures below
the open-letter. Among the scores of names and organizations
were the cream of Mexican business, society, academia, government,
even a long list of commercial fishing cooperativas from the
Alto Golfo.
As a result of this media storm, President Fox told Secretary
Usiabaga, the Minister of SAGARPA, to urge the Senate to cancel
the NORMA. On October 11, 2002, the senate cancelled the NORMA
and ordered that it be modified.
Modifying the Shark NORMA
Now, a new Shark NORMA must be drafted, and keen attention
must be focused where it is most critically needed.
 |
- |
1.
Enforce existing laws. For example, no commercial long
lines 50 miles from the shores of the Sea of Cortes and
15 miles from the Revillagigedo Islands, |
| |
|
|
| |
- |
2. Ban all gill
nets in the Sea of Cortes. |
| |
|
|
SeaWatch, along with Iemanya, the Billfish Fund, Amigos Del
Mar, and other conservation groups are urging the modification
of the existing legislation contained in Shark NORMA 029 because:
 |
|
1.)
the legislation is still alive and could be passed at
anytime |
| |
|
|
| |
|
2.) it contains
some positive elements and |
| |
|
|
| |
|
3.) it will be
easier to change existing legislation to be acceptable
for sustainable management rather than oppose later if
it passes. |
In late May 2003, Iemanya hosted a Scientific Conference
regarding sharks and Shark NORMA in Guaymas with world-renown
scientists in attendance.
At the conference, the group decided that the following modifications
must be made to the Shark NORMA -029 in order to ensure a
sustainable Sea of Cortes.:
 |
|
1.)
Pelagic drift gill nets must be banned in the EEZ |
| |
|
|
| |
|
2.) Medium size
10-20 meter long-line with 900 hooks must be removed from
the 50 mile zone |
| |
|
|
| |
|
3.) Large size
vessels 20-meters or more long-line with 1,500 hooks must
be removed from the 50 mile zone and core areas |
| |
|
|
| |
|
4.) The J hook
type must be banned; only the circular should be accepted
as this reduces the sea turtle and billfish catch. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
5.) A closure season
from May 15- August 11 must be implemented. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
6.) No pelagic
longline fishing in Pangas less than 10 meters 30 miles
out to shore.* |
The original Shark NORMA was stopped because so many people
were willing to stand up for what they believe in and tell
the politicians - and even the President - they did not want
the Sea of Cortes to be destroyed. The modification of Shark
NORMA is another chance for those who care about the future
of the Sea to help determine its outcome.
To find out more about the latest Shark NORMA contact
SeaWatch.
* The members of the conference decided pelagic longlines
should be banned 15 miles out to shore, but SeaWatch maintains
that 15 miles will allow the riberenos to take much of what
is left.
|