|
Starting in the mid 1970's monofilament drift gillnets have
been used commercially to catch pelagic fish along the west
coast of Baja and the Sea of Cortez. These nets, indiscriminate
and destructive, kill an enormous amount of bycatch along
with the targeted species. So thin they are difficult to see
underwater - any animal which swims into a gillnet will fall
victim, including whales, dolphins, turtles, birds, sea lions
and manta rays. These nets, along with longlines, are culpable
for almost all of the killing of 95% of the predatory fish
species in the Sea of Cortez.
Now that pelagic fish in the Sea of Cortez are scarce, it
is no longer commercially viable to use drift gillnets. Instead,
a new young generation of fishermen has discovered an efficient
- yet illegal - method to decimate the few remaining fish
- the reef fish. The young fishermen and their new fleet of
boats are armed with new, 225 meter long inshore monofilament
gillnets. They also have new, large Yamaha motors, new dive
compressors and the latest diving gear. Examples of these
type of boats are the 5 Flor de Maldiva and the 4 Bahia de
La Paz boats that have been working the Islands of San Jose,
Santa Cruz and San Diego in June and July of 2003. These boats
don't even have permits.
Gillnets are finishing off the reef fish at the rate of 1,000
to 1,500 reef fish per boat per day. With a gillnet and this
equipment, it takes a boat just over 3 hours to kill over
a ½ ton of small reef fish (1000-1500 reef fish). They
do this by setting their nets along 200 meters of reef and
then two to four divers, breathing out of hookas connected
to the compressor, and drive the fish into the nets. Each
boat can repeat set nets twice daily, in a process that is
being repeated many times daily along the shores of the southern
gulf Islands between Loreto and Cabo San Lucas.
According to local fishermen, the commercial fishermen operating
from Playa Blanca in the Loreto Marine Reserve are the worst
offenders.
ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES
At one time these islands and the nearby seamounts were a
major attraction to divers from around the world. Though the
major dive community long ago moved on due to depleted fisheries,
sportsfishermen, novice divers, snorkelers, and kayakers continue
to enjoy the tropical waters around these Islands. These divers
and sportsfishermen spend a lot of money. A group of six fisherman
on a five day fishing trip from Los Angeles will spend over
$5000 in Baja California Sur. However, if there are no
fish, these fishermen will not come. Kozy Boren, an American
yachter and fisherman, recently told us that after forty years
of coming to La Paz he was considering taking his business
to Costa Rica because of the lack of fish here. This summer
he can't even catch enough fish to feed the people on his
boat. In the three months that he is in La Paz each year,
he spends over $100,000.
THE ONLY SOLUTION
The short-sighted exploitation of these few remaining fish
continues. There will be major economic impact. The local
fisherman are not the problem, they are only a symptom. The
total lawlessness (anyone can use any method, anytime, anywhere
catch anything and in any quantity they want) and indiscriminate
use of gear types, including nets are the problem. If there
is any chance to save the few remaining fish and to start
rebuilding fish stocks in BCS, there must immediately be a
total ban on monofilament gill nets and that ban must be strictly
enforced. As one fisherman from San Evaristo told SeaWatch,
"We don't waste our time anymore reporting illegal fishing
because no one does anything." If BCS is not ready to
ban all inshore gillnets in their territorial waters, then
they shouldn't waste their time trying to stop any of the
destruction.
Nothing less than a total ban on gillnets will start to stop
the destruction and give impetus to doing things like setting
up no take zones and other measures to ensure a rebuilding
of fish stocks in Baja California Sur.
Gillnets started the major fisheries declines in the Sea
of Cortez in the mid 1970s. Without the political will to
remove them from the Sea of Cortez entirely, they will also
mark the end of the fisheries and inaugurate the start of
more serious social economic problems - problems that will
be much more difficult to solve.
|