|
First let me qualify the following remarks. I speak as an
individual, a concerned sportsman.
I am sorry to see that recent discussions regarding the Revillagigedos
(Rev.) have, in some cases, devolved into an "us versus
them" argument.
As I see it, we are in almost total agreement as to the fundamental
issues surrounding the Rev. problem.
1.- This world-class environment is being severely impacted
by poachers.
2.- Sportfishers (anglers and divers) are not the root of
the problem.
3.- In fact, sportfishers offer one of the best solutions
to the preservation of the biosphere.
Where I think we (all of us) lose perspective is when we
try to interpret and control actions taken by a separate and
sovereign state Mexico. Mexico has made, and continues to
make, fundamental changes as a result of the change in the
ruling party. Mr. Fox has made it clear to his citizens that
the old ways of graft and corruption will end. While these
goals are laudable, they are obviously difficult to implement
is a short time. Nevertheless, the Fox government is making
good on many of its promises.
When I met with representatives of Mexicos top conservationists
and leaders last month, I was surprised with their humility,
intelligence, compassion and overall grasp of local and global
concerns. These men can speak on any topic, from politics,
economics to biology with equal in-depth knowledgeall
in English. A slight digression might help clarify their perspective.
Could you expect such a discussion from our leaders with the
Mexicansin the Mexican language? Further, do you think
our leaders would give the Mexicans the time of day if we
were discussing their right to send fishing vessels from Ensenada
to fish Catalina and the Channel Islands?
The Mexican leaders know that their chief problem resides
within their country. Many of their commercial fishermen sneak
or bribe their way into protected waters. The catching of
the illegal long-liner the Blufin while we visited with them
was a dash of cold water on the face of these leaders.
We were afraid that out of rage and not a little embarrassment
these leaders would call for an immediate closure of islands.
There are all too many wonderful fishing areas closed already,
the Tres Marias several hundred miles to the south and Cocos
Island off Costa Rica just to name a few. We respectfully
begged that these officials allow current sportsmen to continue
at the Islands because of the valuable anti-poaching "eyes"
that they provide. The sudden cancellation of fishing permits
to the Islands was, indeed unfortunatea temporary loss
to those of us with trips scheduled this spring. I am especially
sympathetic of the San Diego based long-range fleet, their
customers and suppliers that laterally had their feet pulled
out from under them.
While the Islands are temporally closed to prefect a management
plan, which many in Mexico say will include sportsmen, we
all have an opportunity to impact the plan by providing scientific
input.
I think everyone agrees that the science surrounding the
Revs. is lacking. A lot has been made about the unscientific
anecdotal observations made by the Sea Watch divers. I studied
Zoology at UC Berkeley with a minor in marine science. I agree
that our observations cannot be considered science. In fact,
this is why I have waited a full 10 years to speak out about
the drastic decrease in marine life and gamefish I have been
witnessing. I kept telling myself just what others have said,
"The fish are offshore, its an El Nino phenomenon,
the fish are running deep, the bait has moved and all the
fish have followed
" I cannot keep my face in the
sand any longer. The fish are disappearing from the Islands
and fast! I agree that there are annual and seasonal, even
daily changes in fish habits. And the occasional bonanza still
happens. However, when you take the peaks and valleys in fish
observations, the trend is clearit is headed down at
a steep angle.
Over 20 years, I have learned the best locations to find
pelagics. Not coincidentally, these areas are often adjacent
long-range boats. Schools of 30 or more wahoo used to be the
norm. Now they are rare. And their size is embarrassingly
small-just little guys now. 200-lb tuna used to be commonplace,
now Im lucky to see one or two a trip. The never-ending
schools of small tuna are all gone. Even if we take at face
value those in the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
who say, "Clearly the yellow fin tuna stocks are healthy",
the fact remains, the fish are decreasing around the Revs.
Here is where I think the anglers and divers can offer a
great deal to the implementation of the management plan. We
should open our records to scientists for study. Each trip
should provide space for a scientific observer, and each trip
should allow for a small percentage if its time in the
pursuit of scientific information about the biology and health
of the Rev. marine environment. The sooner we can get together,
the sooner we will have the Islands reopened and under favorable
terms for anglers and divers alike.
As for interdiction, the Bluefin has been confiscated. The
Mexican Navy just impounded two poaching long-liners. With
the use of real-time satellite imagery, their efforts should
be more effective. The message is out, "fish the Rev.
illegally and your out of business." Lets hope
this effort is sustainable.
|